Talk:Mass-Observation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mass-Observation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mass-Observation or Mass Observation ?[edit]

To hyphenate or not to hyphenate? That is the question. What is the correct answer and why? Nurg (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original book published in 1939 says Mass-Observation, and that's how I've always seen it written. -taras (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The organisation was always known as Mass-Observation, the article should definitely be re-titled. --Noyster (talk) 16:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mass-Observation is right, so please fix it. I have the book. I met Kathleen before she died. I have had conversations with her. Kathleen and Charles Madge's son married a cousin of mine. Kathleen would have been furious to have it spelt otherwise. And it's a feast of hyphens: "Mass-Observation Day-Surveys". P0mbal (talk) 21:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: already moved by User:P0mbal. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Observation → Mass-Observation – (1) The original organisation, founded 1937, was always known as Mass-Observation - see publications listed in the main page, (2) Two other people agree, (3) The words without hyphenation could easily be read as a generic term like "mass production" or "mass hysteria". Counter-arguments might be (1) The hyphen slipped down behind a radiator at the University of Sussex some time after 1981, (2) Michael Hardy saw fit to remove the hyphen in this article title on 4 July 2011. Noyster (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.