Talk:Mary Bateman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sensational lede[edit]

Indeed Bateman was tried, convicted, and executed for witchcraft, but the lede is sensational. She was convicted of witchcraft, but witchcraft means poison. The reader must get to the end of the article to find that a jury found her guilty of murder. I am going to soften this.  Randall Bart   Talk  17:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Bateman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link[edit]

When I'm typing this, the article contains the statement that its subject once worked as a mantua-maker. The word "mantua", although entirely in lower-case, is hot-text that will, when clicked, lead the reader to the Wikipedia article on the city in Italy that is named "Mantua". It should be linked to a garment called "a mantua". I find this exasperating. I mean, put yourself in the reader's position. One gets to the word "mantua" to describe something that the subject made. One has no idea what a mantua is. One SHOULD be able to merely hover the mouse over it and be informed by a little mini-window. But no. One clicks, goes to Italy, then has to start over with a search for "mantua", avoid the placenames, and it takes forever, plus one must then go back to the original place, open the Talk page, and notify the slackards who run Wikipedia that they should be charged fees for such wastes of time. It is beyond what the public should endure.2600:1700:6759:B000:E894:BFCC:705D:880 (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson[reply]

Alas, there are no "slackards who run Wikipedia" just volunteers putting time and effort in make knowledge freely available for everyone out of their own good faith and will. Thanks for the comment. I have fixed the link. If you'd like to learn to contribute to, I'd recommend WP:Teahouse - we're always keen to welcome new volunteers Lajmmoore (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]