This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was created or improved during the Art+Feminism edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in March 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
What happened? I tried to correct mixed-up formatting (footnotes appearing twice and out of place)[edit]
The Marcia Resnick article seemed fine this morning but when I returned this afternoon to add a citation to an earlier book, the footnotes appeared twice and out of place. I tried adding sections as someone suggested, but to no avail. Help is needed.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There was a "closing bracket" (this thing: > ) for a ref tag that was missing in one of your inline citations. One little missing character can cause this kind of silliness where your references display in a really odd manner. I added the closing bracket and then re-added the reflist template. I think you can also safely re-add the defaultsort, but I wanted to keep it simple and make sure it fixed the formatting. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
