Talk:March across Samar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on March across Samar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

Reading through this article, its tone is very problematic. Off-bat, I can cite a few: 1. It does not reference the March across Samar as part of a larger war being waged between the Philippines and America 2. It makes mention of animist tribes without mentioning that the bulk of the Filipino resistance is (was until 1899 when guerrilla tactics were endorsed by the Republic) organized under conventional means. 3. It continually refers to the Filipino forces as rebels and not as agents of an invaded state

This article needs a lot of work, is what I'm saying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.126.152.34 (talk) 06:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apportionment of content between articles[edit]

I looked at Battle of Balangiga § Retaliation today and noticed this content:

As a consequence of this order, Smith became known as "Howling Wilderness Smith"; he was also dubbed "Hell Roaring Jake" Smith, "The Monster", and "Howling Jake" by the press as a result.[1] He further ordered Waller to kill all persons who were capable of bearing arms and in actual hostilities against the United States forces. When queried by Waller regarding the age limit of these persons, Smith replied that the limit was ten years of age.[2]

Food and trade to Samar were cut off, intended to starve the revolutionaries into submission. Smith's strategy on Samar involved widespread destruction to force the inhabitants to stop supporting the guerrillas and turn to the Americans from fear and starvation. He used his troops in sweeps of the interior in search for guerrilla bands and in attempts to capture Philippine General Vicente Lukbán, but he did nothing to prevent contact between the guerrillas and the townspeople. American columns marched across the island, destroying homes and shooting people and draft animals. Littleton Waller, in a report, stated that over an eleven-day period his men burned 255 dwellings, shot 13 carabaos and killed 39 people.[3]

The Judge Advocate General of the Army observed that only the good sense and restraint of the majority of Smith's subordinates prevented a complete reign of terror in Samar. The abuses outraged anti-Imperialist groups in the United States when these became known in March 1902.

The exact number of Filipinos killed by US troops will never be known. A population shortfall of about 15,000 is apparent between the Spanish census of 1887 and the American census of 1903, but how much of the shortfall is due to a disease epidemic and known natural disasters and how many due to combat is difficult to determine. Population growth in 19th century Samar was amplified by an influx of workers for the booming hemp industry, an influx which certainly ceased during the Samar campaign.[4]

Exhaustive research in the 1990s made by British writer Bob Couttie as part of a ten-year study of the Balangiga massacre tentatively put the figure at about 2,500; David Fritz used population ageing techniques and suggested a figure of just more than 2,000 losses in males of combat age but nothing to support widespread killing of women and children.[5] Some American and Filipino historians believe it to be around 50,000.[6][7] The rate of Samar's population growth slowed as refugees fled from Samar to Leyte,[8] yet still the population of Samar increased by 21,456 during the war.

American military historians' opinions on the Samar campaign are echoed in the February 2011 edition of the US Army's official historical magazine, Army History Bulletin: "...the indiscriminate violence and punishment that U.S. Army and Marine forces under Brig. Gen. Jacob Smith are alleged to have unleashed on Samar have long stained the memory of the United States’ pacification of the Philippine Islands".[9]

Other possible concerns aside, it seems to me that most of that content has a closer relationship to this article than to the Battle of Balangiga article. IMO, this needs attention. I'll try to participate, but I'm really busy at present with off-wiki concerns.

Discussion? (I'll mention on the talk page of that other article that I've raised this here) Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Karnow, Stanley. "Two Nations". PBS. Archived from the original on 4 April 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
  2. ^ Bautista, Veltisezar. "The Balangiga, Samar, Massacre". Archived from the original on 26 February 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2008.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference nebrida was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Bob, Couttie. "Searching For Death In Samar". Retrieved 2011-12-11.
  5. ^ Fritz, David L, Before "The Howling Wilderness": The Military Career of Jacob Heard Smith, Military Affairs, November–December (1979), p. 186
  6. ^ Young, Kenneth Ray, "Guerrilla Warfare Revisited", Leyte Samar Studies, XI:1 (1977), pp. 21–31
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference dumindin was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ US Senate Committee Hearings "Affairs in the Philippine Islands" February 3, 1902, Vol. 3, p. 2341
  9. ^ Hendricks, Charles, Editor's Journal, Army History Bulletin, PB 20-11-2 (No. 79), p. 2

Very POV lead[edit]

The title itself is already problematic, but it's especially inappropriate that the lead mentions all these minutiae about the operation and the few US soldiers that died but not the thousands of Filipinos that were killed. Certainly this should be the main focus of the article. Prinsgezinde (talk) 12:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:March_across_Samar&oldid=1216339368"