Talk:Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Delhi Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

I've removed personal contact information from this page and its history. Please contact in case of need the institute directly.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed article, gave it start due to low references and no proper structure. --Debastein (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Much as I would like to add more content to this article, I am restricting myself to providing and updating basic information to prevent possible conflict of interest. I would request other editors to improve this article.--

Sesamevoila (talk) 12:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly update new IDSA LOGO... as updated in official website.[edit]

Kindly update new IDSA LOGO... as updated in official website. TradingZones (talk) 08:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Parrikar effect[edit]

So, we can't regard the IDSA as an autonomous institution any more. It looks practically like a wing of the government. How they destroy the few world class institutions that India has! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]