Talk:Malcolm Riley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Vandels[edit]

Just had a clearout of all the obvious stuff that was false. Have had to use '?' as the year as I dont know what it should really be as no sourced references. Thecyberwasp (talk) 02:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Significance[edit]

I question whether Mr Riley is important enough to be included in wikipedia. The criteria for inclusion state that a person entered for academic merit must be more notable/productive than the average University professor. From the evidence here Mr Riley seems no more prolific or noteworthy than numerous other university composers and musicologists. He has also not had widespread coverage in the national or international media, which would warrant his inclusion. He regularly contributes to "Gramophone" magazine, but if that is the basis for inclusion, then wikipedia's entry criteria would have to be expanded to have entries for almost all journalists, columnists and regular contributors to British magazines and newspapers. 138.48.16.169 (talk) 18:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)V. Jones[reply]

And no more prolific than other biographers? He's one of the few people from the County Town of North Yorkshire who've made names for themselves. Noteworthy != specialist!--Rfsmit (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Malcolm Riley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]