Talk:Magnox Ltd

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magnox Ltd article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

On 23 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Nuclear Restoration Services. The result of the discussion was not moved.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Magnox Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magnox Ltd → Nuclear Restoration Services – Magnox Ltd has been renamed to Nuclear Restoration Services as part of a government rebrand of nuclear institutions. In line with Great British Nuclear (legally BNFL Ltd), I suggest we move this article to NRS to maximise searchability and easiness to link. 12xii (talk) 11:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand this position and entirely agree that current searchability is not perfect, but I propose we keep this page as Magnox Ltd. I think this is the right approach as 'Nuclear Restoration Services Limited' will soon become the legal entity of the NRS brand. Though I can't find an online source for this, the plan has been communicated to NRS staff internally and there is a placeholder company ready to assume this role (see companies house for company no: 14967755). I think that once the legal entity becomes 'Nuclear Restoration Services Limited', a 'Nuclear Restoration Services' article should be established and any NRS content split out from the Magnox Ltd article into the NRS one, reverting this article to a record of Magnox Ltd pre-rebrand. I think this would better reflect the significant change the organisation has undergone - for what it's worth, the rebrand has been driven by a merger with another nuclear site licence company (Dounreay Site Restoration Limited), and it anticipates NRS taking ownership of decommissioning of 7 (currently operational) AGR sites in the future. I'd a

argue the purpose of the article would change significantly enough to warrant a new article. JonnyFellOver (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.