This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Article was vandalized in fall 2015 with misinformation, proposing massive revert back to summer 2015 version[edit]
We need to have a discussion about pulling this article back to the summer 2015 version, permanently protecting this article, and then restoring recent developments and financial figures post-2015. If you look at the versions in June and December 2015, it's like night and day.
The article was vandalized in this edit on 3 September 2015 to incorrectly credit the founding of the company to Xavier Warren. I just noticed that vandalism seven years later. Then I started looking at various other facts in the article and realized it had been heavily vandalized with misinformation in fall 2015 while no one was paying attention. At this point, it looks like the article is beyond salvage; about 50% is worthless unsourced garbage and needs to go. Any objections? --Coolcaesar (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
