Talk:M51 (missile)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M51 (missile) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Do we have any data about the CEP of this missile?--Arado 15:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M51 (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/programme2/m-51-juy.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011095502/http://www.defpro.com/news/details/16676 to http://www.defpro.com/news/details/16676/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense-news/2016/05/10/airbus-and-safran-agree-space-launcher-joint-venture/84178824/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

M51 missile test.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

directly derived from...Ariane 5?[edit]

Is there any source for "The three-stage engine of the M51 is directly derived from the solid propellant boosters of Ariane 5"? The linked source doesn't state anything like that. Also it is "common knowledge" (without me being able to provide you a source) that solids for ICBMS can be stored for a very long time and still function perfectly. Solids for carriers like Ariane 5 have a shorter life and the propellants become unusable after some time. SpaceRacer (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"M51 (missile" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect M51 (missile has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § M51 (missile until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]