Talk:Lotusflow3r

Untitled

Shouldn't there be created separate pages for MPLSound and Elixer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.197.134.207 (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Untitled

What is the source for the title with the 3 in it? OK, Rolling Stone wrote it, but it said "Lotus Flower (or Lotus Flow3r)" . The website is called "Lotus Flow3r", but that's because maybe the www.lotusflower.com was already taken. --Jeroen (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I would guess that it refers to the Trinity which feature in the Jehovah's Witnesses as Father Christ and Holy Spirit. Prince of course is now a devout Jehovah's Witness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.99.94 (talk) 09:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Knowing Prince, he might have actually changed the album title because "lotusflower.com" URL was taken. Nothing like a good reason to place an unnecessary digit in an English word.--Jsl83 (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The three albums will be sold exclusively at Target stores as a 3-disc set

I won't be too sure about the exclusivity of Target before the release of the album(s). quite unrealistic. maybe it will be as exclusive as planet earth was given away exclusively with an GB newspaper... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.120.178 (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

LOTUSFLOW3R + MPLSOUND

According the meta data of the website lotusflow3r.com the album titles are both fully capitalized. See here. I tried to rename it, but somehow I read: ""LOtUSFLOW3R" cannot be moved to "LOTUSFLOW3R", because the title "LOTUSFLOW3R" is on the title blacklist. If you feel that this move is valid, please consider requesting the move first."

Also MPLSOUND should be a different article, because the albums are clearly advertised as separate albums. --Jeroen (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

i agree with you, having considered doing this myself. however, the majority of references are about LOTUS as a whole set, so i think we should wait. MaJic (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lotusflower (album set). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090304174419/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/rockdaily/index.php/2009/03/03/prince-teams-with-target-to-release-three-new-albums-as-1199-bundle/ to http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/03/03/prince-teams-with-target-to-release-three-new-albums-as-1199-bundle/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081228042602/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/rockdaily/index.php/2008/12/18/prince-premieres-four-new-songs-on-las-indie-103-new-album-on-the-way to http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/12/18/prince-premieres-four-new-songs-on-las-indie-103-new-album-on-the-way/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)