Talk:Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 2

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: Looney Tunes Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Interlacing[edit]

This might merit more explanation, though I'm not sure this is the place for it. I attributed the effect to differing frame rates in the original prints. Most of the later films appear to be frame-for-frame (doubled up) (aa-bb-cc-dd) while some of the early ones are interlaced (a-ab-b-bc-c). So the relative ratios of film frames to DVD frames is 1:2 in the first case and 2:3 in the second. I'm not aware of the DVD encoding process and whether that would have an effect not already required for the display standard. --Dystopos 14:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Apparently, they own progressive copies for all these films, but for the NTSC version they probably digitally re-encoded the video. This would explain the PAL version being 25 fps progressive, as re-encoding NTSC telecines in PAL results as very, VERY bad interlaced video of low quality. --213.91.184.25 16:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Define "adequately covered"[edit]

One article for an ongoing annual series of box set collections is simply not enough. The articles for the individual volumes must be kept intact. Steelbeard1 (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been saved. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]