Talk:Long Ashton railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLong Ashton railway station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Butt - is it accurate?[edit]

I'm fairly certain that this station did not open in June 1841. MacDermott lists all the stations opened at that time but does not include Ashton. I wonder where Butt got this date? Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Long Ashton railway station. Long Ashton is not the same station as any of the several named simply Ashton. For Long Ashton, Butt records that it was opened as Long Ashton Platform 12 July 1926, renamed Long Ashton 23 September 1929, closed 6 October 1941. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Long Ashton railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 20:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • It is always a good idea to mention what country you are writing about. (fixed)
  • Year ranges and punctuation uses endash (–) not a hyphen (-). (fixed)
  • Avoid not spelling of "member of parliament" as non-Commonwealth readers may not understand the meaning of the abbreviation. (fixed)
  • The MOS has strict use of what can be in italics, and names of stations, including old names, is not covered. (fixed)
  • The lead is rather short, even given the article's length. It would recommend that it be slightly longer by including the alternative opening dates and include the alternative names used by the station at various times. Perhaps also mention the construction cost of the second station.
    Lengthened. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would not recommend using external links to link to authors. If they are notable internal links can be used, even if they are red.

Otherwise the article looks fine. Placing on hold.Arsenikk (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 21:07, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Long Ashton railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Long Ashton railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Long Ashton railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]