Talk:London lobsters

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

Lobsters[edit]

I would say the fact that redocats were called lobsters, as well as Hasselrigs curraissers, is not related and just coincidental. The Curraissers would have been called lobster because of their armour's resemblence to a lobsters armour like exosekelton, whereas the redcoats would have been called lobsters because they were red...like a lobster.

I agree and have removed the assertion, which was not referenced in any way. Urselius (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any more Info ?[edit]

Quite interested in this unit, and the performance of their armour.

Their performance in battle was rather patchy, they tended to rely on their pistols and were decidedly slow-moving. At Roundaway Down the lighter-equipped Royalist cavalry broke them because they stood still and the Royalists charged them at a gallop with drawn swords. The breastplate, shoulder-pieces and sometimes helmet were usually pistol-proof, but only the breastplate could be made musket-proof by wearing a 'placate' or reinforce (essentially a second breastplate), which made the armour very heavy indeed. Urselius (talk) 19:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on London lobsters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120905221927/http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/cheriton.pdf to http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/cheriton.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]