Talk:Logluv TIFF
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
One of the other drawbacks of 24 bit RGB was the linerization of the colors. Who said the RGB color model has a linear relation between its numeric values and the actual intensity outputted? --Abdull 18:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Colour Depth Claim[edit]
According to the TIFF standard, a Baseline Colour TIFF file is 24 bit RGB, but using the BitsPerSample parameter the TIFF standard mentions expanding this to 16 or 32 bits per sample - i.e. 48 or 96 bit colour. I believe that Photoshop uses this expanded colour range already. Also, the numbers in this article do not add up: 15 bits per colour * 3 colours = 45 bit colour, not 48 bit colour. --Ozhiker 00:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
This was all wrong anyway, Logluv is 32bit or 24 bit. --GENtLe 00:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Logluv TIFF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040916044904/http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/ to http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)