Talk:Littlejohn adaptor

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Shell (projectile)#APCNR|armour-piercing, composite non-rigid]] The anchor (#APCNR) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Shell (projectile)#Armour-piercing, discarding-sabot]] The anchor (#Armour-piercing, discarding-sabot) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Dates?[edit]

"...had been designed and built earlier in the war..." Which war? No dates are given in this article, except a reference to the development of the concept in 1930. The obvious conclusion is WWII, but this should be explicit. -- Super Aardvark 17:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Which František Janeček?[edit]

František Janeček died in Germans-occupied Prague in 1941. Maybe it was his son František Karel, but I've never heard that he managed to fled away to Great Britain. Heffalump1974 (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Dimishing volume"[edit]

A tapered bore cannot cause the internal volume to diminish as the shell moves down it. The volume is increasing no matter what, as long as the shell is moving down the barrel. What changes is that the rate of increase drops off in proportion to the taper, while meanwhile the hot gases continue to expand, and pressure spikes at some point during the travel. The only way that the internal volume could actually diminish is if the shell were forced backwards down the bore. I have changed the sentence, but it is a little awkward still. Someone may want to tackle that.

64.222.158.24 (talk) 05:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]