Talk:List of power stations in South Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1MW floor on list candidates[edit]

I have set a minimum of 1MW generation capacity for power stations on this list. This is pretty arbitrary, but there needs to be a cutoff somewhere, otherwise you get the situation where either every power generation construction is listed, or private installations of some magnitude aren't listed, neither of which are desirable. I figure that 1MW is starting to contribute considerably to the generation capacity of the state as a whole. Webaware 11:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COGEN[edit]

Note: Osborne is COGEN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.76.149 (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne is co-gen in the sense that it produces process steam for use in industry, as a byproduct of its electricity generation. However, the co-generation section of this page (currently, at least) refers to generation of electricity from heat captured as a byproduct of industry. Refer to the page on Osborne for more information. Webaware talk 07:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of power stations in South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]