Talk:List of post towns in the United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Radstock[edit]

Radstock (BA3) isn't in this list, but the Radstock page considers it to be a post town. Anyone? (This from 212.219.56.214 (talk · contribs))

Good catch. Next time, you're welcome to fix it yourself. Noisy | Talk 14:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bootle?[edit]

There seems to be an odd situation around Bootle - it has its own post town, but is entirely surrounded by Liverpool post town, which includes Crosby, Aintree, Maghull, Waterloo, Litherland, Kirkdale, Walton, Fazakerley...but not Bootle! Are there any other odd cases like this? — sjorford++ 17:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hove is surrounded by Brighton post town, see [1]. 91.85.32.166 (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sandringham and Hunstanton are surrounded by Kings Lynn post town, see [2] 82.153.101.160 (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
North Walsham is surrounded by the Norwich post town, [3]. As you can see, Bootle is not really an "odd case", it's very common to have a post town surrounded by another one. 109.176.195.171 (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate lists of postcode districts[edit]

The above page is just this page but better and more readable. I have proposed a merge. 91.85.32.166 (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:List of postcode districts in the United Kingdom#Merger proposal for discussion. — Richardguk (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Related categories proposed for deletion[edit]

Richardguk (talk) 08:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Discussion now closed. The result of the discussion was: delete. — Richardguk (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of post towns in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]