Talk:List of places of worship in the City of Leeds

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal List of places of worship in the City of Leeds is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Church of England denomination[edit]

This article has a mixture of Anglican and Church of England wording for churches with a Church of England (Anglican) denomination. For consistency these should be the same - is there any preference for which wording should be adopted? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The term Anglican is the broader term, including churches abroad which are not formally part of the CofE. I think that in Leeds the narrower term will be generally applicable, which is consistent with being more precise with all places, where the information is available. Chemical Engineer (talk) 08:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - done - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closed or disused places of worship[edit]

Would this not be better entitled "Former places of worship" since many buildings have a new secular use but are neither closed nor disused? Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - done - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-section headings[edit]

Each of the locality sub-section tables in this article starts with a heading comment which commences "Order: denomination (descending order of number of places of worship, then alphabetically ...)". What is the relevance of this? Most of the tables appear to list places of worship alphabetically, albeit they are sortable, but I can't see any which are listed in a descending order of the number of places of worship by denomination in that locality. Suggest we remove the "descending order of number of places of worship" wording? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree I always ignored it. Alphabetical makes more sense. Chemical Engineer (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So I have removed them.Chemical Engineer (talk)

Thanks for undertaking this maintenance. BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-section titles[edit]

I think it would be useful to make each section title a wikilink, as I have done with Adel so that anyone who is not sure of the area referred to can go straight to the article. (I think this is not wikistyle for general articles, but it works for me. It is also not necessary to repeat the name of the area, nor Leeds in the location of each. Postcodes are helpful to find them on maps, so I put them in where I can. However, note that websites giving contact addresses sometimes give the postcode for the house of the priest. Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So I have wikilinked the area tities.Chemical Engineer (talk) 11:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General Issues (minor)[edit]

It is old-fashioned to have a full stop after "St". Wikipedia articles generally do not, so links here that do are redirected. (See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Full_stops_and_spaces) There is no point adding a comment on the location of the church "This church is situated on XXXXXX" when that information is already given in the location box. Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major Sources[edit]

I have added this section at the top, so that they are references 1,2,3,4. If you wish to use them, note that they each have a name, so you can just put ref name=Minnis/ inside <> to cite the first one. They are all available on the internet, though Minnis is also a book. I have given a link here as well as in the reference, because it is a long way down to the references if you want to go directly! Chemical Engineer (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of places of worship in the City of Leeds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

CalverleyParishChurch.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Religious buildings and places of worship[edit]

Note that on Wikimedia Commons the category 'Places of worship in Leeds by location' is within the category 'Religious buildings in Leeds'. However, there is a distinction between Religious Buildings (those built or converted principally for religious use) and Places of Worship, which is frequently a room inside a much larger secular building.

1 I propose that the listed building designation should not be used where the place of worship is only a small rented part of a listed building.
2 How far do we want to go with rooms that are rented once a week for a small group to meet? Some of these do not last long, and may move around a lot, potentially giving a large number of 'Former places of worship'. I propose that this is should only be used for former Religious Buildings.

Opinions? Chemical Engineer (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gateland Lane, Shadwell[edit]

@Chemical Engineer, the article refers to a demolished church site at 23 Gateland Lane whereas the photograph is 25 Gateland Lane. Whilst recognising that plots from around 600 years ago are not aligned with modern property numbers, I wonder whether the property numbers referenced should still be the same? BobKilcoyne (talk) 09:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]