Talk:List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Saints / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Interwiki links[edit]

What is with all the interwiki links on this page? While it doesn't seem forbidden by policy, it seems to be somewhat unfriendly to our average English-language reader to jerk him out of en.wiki and plunge him into a Spanish or Italian article that he is unlikely to understand. I suggest instead redlinks or no link at all for those who do not currently have an article on en.wiki. I would think that on the path to sainthood, it is increasingly likely that articles will be created for these people, so I would be most in favor of redlinking. Elizium23 (talk) 20:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree. I know for me personally linking to articles in most any language other than German and a little Latin is basically counterproductive and rather off-putting. It would I think be much easier to create even mini-stubs here in the English wikipedia with interwiki links to the more significant articles in other languages. John Carter (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use the {{ill}} which is a red link with another interlanguage link in parenthesis. When a page is created in the English language Wikipedia, the foreign interlanguage link will not be shown. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 00:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PERFECT solution! Thank you so much. I have implemented this for this article. Now let's hope Joloimpat keeps it that way. Elizium23 (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that @Joloimpat: changed from Elizium23's {{ill}} without any comment or consensus. Maybe he will respond to this ping. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He won't, and I am prepared to go to WP:ANI about his disruptive editing and warring without a hint of discussion. Final warning is posted to his talk page. Anyone who succeeds in getting him to discuss will win a civility barnstar! Elizium23 (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium23, BoBoMisiu, John Carter, let me know if Joloimpat starts edit warring again. I'm leaving him one last warning about not communicating with others and I've told him that if he does any of this again without actually participating in a discussion, he will receive a temporary block. The only thing I can figure (out of good faith) is that he may not be proficient enough in English to converse with others on talk pages. The other option is that he does not want to discuss anything, which can make his edits disruptive by large since he doesn't seem to want to discuss anything with anyone. I can understand not being a big fan of talking on Wikipedia, but at some point you have to do it or it's seen as disruptive. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - yes, something definitely sank in after the WP:ANI thread, because he's keeping and actually adding the {{ill}} markup now. Thanks for your help. Elizium23 (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank goodness- I'd still prefer that Joloimpat talk to people on Wikipedia and/or leave edit synopses that somewhat accomplish the same task or explain what he's doing, but at least this is something. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120428205552/http://saints.sqpn.com/indexsnt.htm to http://saints.sqpn.com/indexsnt.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]