Talk:List of nature centers in the United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas

This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Is there a way to get all of the addressess for these. I would like to put these in a GIS. The USGS Names (GNIS) database doesn't have very many nature centers on it. I would put it back on the wiki.134.67.6.14 (talk) 20:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

This article has an egregious WP:NOTDIRECTORY problem. That's not acceptable, and I don't see any argument which counters that. As such, I'll be restoring the version which replaced all of the external links with redlinks, per WP:BUILD. Editors who wish to maintain huge collections of links to websites are advised to do so outside of Wikipedia. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold off on your change. I have been working on more useful lists for each state, but it takes me along time. Jllm06 (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you need a list of external links to every center in the interim? It's there in the page history if needed. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than removing all the links, why don't you turn them into footnotes? That would be more helpful than eliminating everything. The list is used by the Association of Nature Center Administrators and individual nature centers to locate other centers, and I hope by individuals interested in visiting nature centers. As a volunteer, my time is limited. Thank you for your consideration.Jllm06 (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're not references. As I've previously stated, the purpose of Wikipedia is not to provide a directory service, no matter how useful that may be. If you wish to retain a copy of such information it should be hosted elsewhere. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I ask you to reconsider changing this list. It will lose much of its useability as a reference. It is tremendously useful as an easily edited article for people around the country through Wikipedia, as seen by the many editors. PLEASE do not make the change you are proposing. I am not a software expert, just a dedicated volunteer.Jllm06 (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought this to a wider forum at WT:USA so that more opinions can be gathered. It also affects quite a few related lists, so it's something that the WikiProject should probably reach a consensus on. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In general, external links don't belong in the body of an article. They should only appear as references (if they are being used that way) or as ELs in a separate section below the references. Using them in this fashion may look "neater" because it eliminates redlinks, but it discourages the creation of potential articles to "turn the redlinks blue". I'm with Chris on this, they need to go. Imzadi 1979 → 14:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The links need to go completely. Either redlink or delete the list entry, but both the WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:ELNO apply here. GregJackP Boomer! 18:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of nature centers in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504060934/http://www.eeweek.org/nature_centers.htm to http://www.eeweek.org/nature_centers.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]