Talk:List of game engines
 | The Bork3D Game Engine article was blanked on 2024-03-25 and that title now redirects to List of game engines. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
| The CopperCube article was blanked on 2024-03-25 and that title now redirects to List of game engines. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
 | This article is not a linkfarm. Before adding products to the list, make sure they are notable by having their own article. If not, try writing the article first. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Bork3D is listed as proprietary but the article says it changed to BSD (libre / open)[edit]
Someone should update it but I haven't edited Wikipedia in years and I'm scared of messing it up. 98.214.101.208 (talk) 06:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
You are correct. Fixed. Thank you Slacka123 (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of game engines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304001531/http://www.cafu.de/features to http://www.cafu.de/features
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Display number of games created using an engine[edit]
When linking to a list of games created using an engine, use "56 games" as a link title instead of "List". 46.242.13.112 (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Alternatively, introduce a separate column with the number of games created using an engine; this is probably better as it will allow sorting. 46.242.13.112 (talk) 22:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Sorting of dimensions does not work. 2D should be listed above 2.5D, now it doesn't. Maybe we should put a space between the number and the D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.179.117.162 (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Defolds change in language[edit]
I am sorry to disturb but dosn't Defold now use Go (programming language). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikhail's Unieo (talk • contribs) 05:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Edit request[edit]
| This article isn't protected, so you should be able to edit it yourself. If you are still having problems editing it, please ask for advice at WP:TEAHOUSE. |
- What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): I would appreciate it if the following information was added to the Game Engine list table:
--whether the game engine is able to be used by 3rd-party independent developers/companies (for example, Unity allows external programmers to use their game engine for a price/percentage of sales etc.) --current size/worth of the company/organization that owns the game engine
- Why it should be changed: The column "License" is helpful to have a basic overview on how each game engine's license works. Unfortunately, merely describing a license as "proprietary" does not describe whether a game engine is an exclusive internal game engine or if an external game developer(s) can make their own games with it. A new column for current Company Size/Worth helps keep track of the current impact of each game engine. I have done a bit of research for a few of the (top (AKA first alphabetically listed) game engines and can add that information in if needed.
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
AnonyBanana (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- This isn't a change that can be implemented as an edit request. You'd have to supply the information you want changed for every single row. This is more a suggestion for shifting the table to a new format and would need consensus and someone willing to do that work. "Available to public" might be a worthwhile column, but I'd oppose a "company size/worth" column as drawing conclusions not necessarily supported. A huge company might have an engine that's barely used. -- ferret (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)