Talk:List of explorers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cabrillo[edit]

What about [[Juan Rodr�guez Cabrillo]]? Wasn't he important as well? How come he is not listed in the line of famous explorers? So please add him. 170.158.127.50 13:34, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He is already there, in the "C" subsection (for Cabrillo, his last family name, that of his father according to Portuguese naming system). His name is written in the Portuguese form - João Rodrigues Cabrilho. The Ogre 15:28, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism...[edit]

Please 170.158.127.50 refrain from experimenting with the articles in such a way that may be considered as vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. The Ogre 18:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism[edit]

The red section in the main explorers box can definitely be counted as vandalism. We should stop this person that obviously doesn't want to help Wikipedia, but use it as a source of fun and vandalism to be supposedly cool or funny.The great Cube 00:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad ibn Fadlan's origin[edit]

What is the basis for asserting that Ahmad ibn Fadlan's nationality is "Iraqi"? He was active in the 10th century, prior to the establishment of the state of Iraq. [[ality, with our without replacement. Nationality doesn't mean much. I mean, it means something (often), but it's not overly noteworthy, and - as discussed above - frequently problematic, confusing or misleading. Besh (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Bass[edit]

GB's nationality is given as Australian. He was born in England, qualified in England, married in England and the purpose of his last voyage in 1997 was "to return to England" according to [1]. Is there any evidence to suggest he changed nationality?

Dinoceras (talk) 11:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Separate tables[edit]

The sortable tables here are useless with everything split onto different letters of the alphabet. Any objections to me merging them into a single table? I've also noticed that some of the nationality links go to a country and some go to the related * people article, like Swedish people or Spanish people. As our article on Nationality states, it refers to the legal relationship between a person and a state, so the * people links really should be amended. I'm willing to make the changes, but I'd prefer to discuss first. Matt Deres (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Fixed the links for nationalities. Now all links are for people articles. Empirecoins (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of explorers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a list of explorers.[edit]

Dear wikipedians,

This page is not a list of explorers. It's a list of MALE explorers. It does not take into account FEMALE explorers, and treats them as a subcategory, as if the "default" explorer had to be male. The English noun "explorer" is gender-neutral and the list should therefore include women. Or it should be more aptly named "list of male explorers." I will edit it myself whenever I have the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.248.37 (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. While it is an overwhelmingly male list (as is history it seems), it is not EXCLUSIVELY Male. There are a number of female explorers present. ThatBritishPleb (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explorer's[edit]

Not all Explorer's are here. 216.93.130.18 (talk) 20:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]