Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Euphoria

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Euphoria (American TV series) was copied or moved into List of awards and nominations received by Euphoria on February 12, 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Schwede66 (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Zendaya won the Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Drama Series, defeating Emma D'Arcy in House of the Dragon? Source: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-2023-winners-list-1235294541/
- Reviewed:

Converted from a redirect by CastJared (talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/List of awards and nominations received by Euphoria; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

(Just a note, not a review:) CastJared, the article is currently not eligible because it's required to have 1500 prose characters, but is now only 1045, since text in tables (most of the article) doesn't count. See WP:DYK#Long enough. Please expand the text above the list. You may use the DYKcheck tool to see the article's prose size. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Review:

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough: - As mentioned above, it is too short. Per DYK criteria #2a: "Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables etc.)." Moreover, DYK criteria #1b requires that "The content that makes the article eligible must be new and original content on English Wikipedia." That is to say that the text in the tables and the text that was copied over from the Euphoria (American TV series) article does not count towards meeting the 1,500 minimum characters of prose. With that in mind, the new and original content in the article amounts to around 630 characters of prose currently.

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - See below.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - See below.
Other problems: - The article does not meet Wikipedia's core policies. First, the majority of the text was copied from Euphoria (American TV series) without attribution (see WP:Copying within Wikipedia). Second, the lead has a lot of content that is not sourced elsewhere in the article (see WP:Verifiability).

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Per DYK criteria #3, the hook facts must be mentioned in the article and supported by an inline citation to a reliable source. However, the hook mentions that House of the Dragon's Emma D'Arcy lost out for the Golden Globe Award, yet neither the actress nor the TV show are mentioned anywhere in the article.
Interesting: - The hook essentially says that Actress A won an acting award over Actress B. This happens at every award ceremony, hence I don't think there is any unusual or intriguing aspect to the proposed hook.

QPQ:
Overall: Please refer to the DYK eligibility criteria. This article currently doesn't meet quite a lot of the criteria and will require considerable work to be eligible for DYK. Please let me know if you intend to work on the article to meet the criteria. Otherwise, I will regretfully have to fail this nomination. Bennv123 (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CastJared: since you've read and removed [1] the message I left on your talk page about this nomination (which is perfectly within your rights to do), and haven't responded on the nomination page or made any relevant changes to the article, I'm taking that to mean that you do not intend to see this nomination through. That is understandable as it will require a considerable commitment to see this one through as it currently stands. Regretfully, that means that I am updating my review to fail this nomination. If this was your first DYK nomination attempt, please don't be discouraged and try again once you've familiarized yourself with the DYK eligibility criteria. Bennv123 (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]