Talk:List of ancient legal codes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

a thought[edit]

Maybe these codes should by layed out in the order that they occured. Sorry about grammer & the such I am typing this on an iPod —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krj373 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes chronological order would be way more useful. Shall I go ahead and do that? Bhny (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ancient legal codes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908205713/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/hammint.htm to http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/hammint.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharia and Halacha[edit]

Neither of these are a single code but legal systems, as varied and extensive as secular ones, and they are living systems, sages are still making new Halacha and new Sharia on a daily basis. In this regard they are also not really ancient, only having ancient roots. Maybe their fundamental documents could be added, depending on the definition of ancient.--Nngnna (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]