Talk:List of Roman aqueducts by date
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
The table at Aqueduct (Roman) doesn't provide source or terminus; it could be reformatted to include these, but until then I think this entry should stay. Trachys 13:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
This list is good if you think that Rome was the only city in the empire that had aqueducts. It was not.--SkiDragon (talk) 05:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
For those intricately familiar with the terms for different sections (underground, arches, at-ground?), it would be useful to have some input regarding the multiple meanings of Aqueduct, particularly correct terminology and classification: Aqueduct#Suggested split. —Sladen (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
redirects here!?
It should not be a redirect, aqueducts are a far larger topic than just aqueducts in Rome. I will expand the list soon when I have found enough aqueducts to list.Shannon1talk contribs 01:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Roman aqueducts by date. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070423055106/http://www.iath.virginia.edu/rome/ to http://www.iath.virginia.edu/rome
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)