Talk:List of 21st-century explosions

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Explosives Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Standardisation of Layout[edit]

The layout here is very odd for no apparent reason. There is one table covering from 2001 - 2010 (with no heading), another table with a different width covering from 2011 - 2014, and a third table with different width again covering from 2015 to today.

We need to standardise. Either we put everything in one big table, or divide things along easily comprehensible lines (such as by decade) with headings on each section. Plus the tables should be all the same width, probably the same as List of explosions & List of 20th-century explosions.

- Andrewaskew (talk) 05:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria for inclusion? (also: Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery explosion)[edit]

What is the criteria for inclusion here?

The Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery explosion in June 2019 (https://www.csb.gov/chemical-safety-board-releases-factual-update-and-new-animation-detailing-the-events-of-the-massive-explosion-and-fire-at-the-pes-refinery-in-philadelphia-pa/; with video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2kCwNKEFBY) was notable and widely reported, but it's not on the list. Also, to my knowledge, it doesn't have a wikipedia article either.

I was going to add it but there were no injuries or deaths in that accident, so I'm not sure if it actually belongs on the list or not, since all the other incidents listed involved casualties.

Is this list reserved for incidents with casualties? If not, is there any reason not to add it to the list?

69.121.57.177 (talk) 12:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Merge into List of explosions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.

I think this article should be merged back into List of explosions as I have yet to see any rationale for the list to have gotten split into three separate pages to begin with. This article has 44,611 bytes of markup compared to the other's 6,408 bytes, though that figure was 4,368 bytes before I restored the 20th century entries after the List of 20th-century explosions page was deleted. - MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.