Talk:Lilburn family

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on House of Lilburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150619175108/http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook_text/A_System_of_Heraldry_Speculative_and_Practical_With_the_True_Art_of_v1_1000700671/237 to http://www.forgottenbooks.com/readbook_text/A_System_of_Heraldry_Speculative_and_Practical_With_the_True_Art_of_v1_1000700671/237
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610030715/http://www.hexhamcourant.co.uk/2.2957/gardening/garden-glories-surround-the-gothic-splendours-of-lilburn-1.180982 to http://www.hexhamcourant.co.uk/2.2957/gardening/garden-glories-surround-the-gothic-splendours-of-lilburn-1.180982

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

13 August 2021

This article is an absolutely third-rate agglomeration of sources like "Houseofnames.com" and "The Internet Surname Database", many of which were cleverly combined and built upon to aggrandise this family in what was, based on the edit history, evidently a vanity project of some sort for a now long-departed editor. In fact, based on available published, reliable sources, this family was never quite such a great thing as a "House of Lilburn", but minor gentry. For example, the claim of a title "Earl of Dunstanburgh" appears entirely fictional. I trimmed, reorganised and focused the article considerably, admittedly removing a good deal of the non-notable family members (all of whom arranged in an illogical and counterintuitive way) unsupported- and impossible to corroborate, using Google books or other internet sources- "family tradition"/ legend stuff, as can be seen here for anyone interested in how the article could have looked with a little attention: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=House_of_Lilburn&type=revision&diff=1038594736&oldid=1016808833