Talk:Liking gap

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liking gap article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 September 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LukeMarkham.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for further editing[edit]

The main thing that needs to be addressed here is and explanation of the research that has been done on this subject. It is still a relatively new idea but by explaining the various manners in which this gap has been studied a reader will understand its significance better. It can also be linked to multiple other wiki pages like first impressions and other sources like the book Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. These are related topics but there are a lot of other references that could be added to this topic. As it is a relatively new research topic there should not be a lot added to it as of yet but at least a paragraph or two needs to be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LukeMarkham (talk • contribs) 02:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Empirical research - still unclear?[edit]

I noticed that one study was referred to in such a way that suggested it was 3 separate studies; it was actually a study with 3 parts so I made changes to attempt to better reflect this. I hope my edits constitute a positive change in terms of clarity.

However, I was unsure about whether the rest of the paragraph from "In another study, videos of first encounters were judged based on..." is intended to refer to that study or a different study? So was unsure how/whether to cite or make any further changes. Kodyq (talk) 04:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]