Talk:Liebeslieder Waltzes, Op. 52

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconClassical music: Compositions
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Perhaps this and Neue Liebeslieder belong in Category:Song cycles by Johannes Brahms‎? Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a failure to distinguish between(not always completely attributed) research and generally accepted fact here, not helped by jargon,and several levels of reference. Why insist we consider - not what Bloom himself says, but what Hussey says he says? Why tell us that Brodbeck thinks that Schubert influenced Brahms through the twenty landler which Wikipedia itself tells us in red it doesn't cover and only then tell us that this is a secondary source confected by Brahms himself? And then argue that in establishing his own order for the confection itself Brahsm was conferring original unity on the pieces? Not, surely, acceptable without question by the general reader. One would always like to check out anything Rosen writes, but here we can't - the reference is simply "print". If I go to the Henry Watson Music Library and ask for "print" I might never be allowed to show my face there again. And so on. Could another look be taken at the way this has been written?Delahays (talk) 19:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically are you talking about? Chuckstreet (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]