Talk:Leslie A. Baxter

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on December 24, 2017. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sydneyhylland.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review (Olivia Vogt)[edit]

1) Are all the parts there?

It appears that all necessary sections are here. Consider a subheading for "professional life." It makes sense to include education in the Background but maybe her work after getting her degrees needs a new section. Also consider making and "Awards and Honors" section, or something like it, since you have so much good info here about her recognition!

2) Is the opening "hook" strong?

Yes, the relevance of the scholar is immediately apparent. Good job putting that first! One sentence that seems a bit off in the intro: "Her work is focused on relationships like romantic, marital, and friendships." It seems odd that the list goes adjective, adjective, noun. Maybe "Her work is focused on friendships, marriages, and other relationships."

3) How's the style? (spelling, grammar, clear sentences, correct verb tense.

It seems very professional and clean. Should there be citations in the text? If so, make sure you get those in there. There is a lot of good info in here. A few little typos I caught:

At the beginning of Scholarly Work: "Dr. Baxter’s has dedicated her work "....I think the "'s" is left over from a different thought here.

Right after that: "Relational Dialectics Theory, which was created by herself and Barbara Montgomery, and has been mentioned in books, scholarly journals, and received awards." I think it's "created by Baxter and Barbara Montgomery," but don't quote me on that. :)

Right before you go into the awards: "A study done with Daena Goldsmith that looked at communication in dating couples." This confused me. Is it an unfinished sentence maybe? What is the study, or what did it find/accomplish?

4) Overall impression of the article.

Overall very informative and well-researched! It is obvious you looked closely at Dr. Baxter's history and scholarly work to get this article to where it is.

Great feedback from Olivia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aburnett412 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]