Talk:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2012 developments[edit]

Seems to be further maneuvering in 2012 (though I'm not sure what the outcome is): https://www.eff.org/press/releases/dancing-baby-video-battle-back-court-tuesday -- AnonMoos (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"In a decision rejecting a motion to dismiss the claim"[edit]

I edited to specify which claim the district court decided not to dismiss: "In a decision rejecting a motion to dismiss the misrepresentation claim..." I'm not a lawyer, but in retrospect I guess the only part the court was deciding was the claim of misrepresentation, and not the DMCA "claim" that started it all, and I also realize that a DMCA claim is probably not considered the same sort of claim. But, it threw me off on first read so I fixed it. Advance apologies if I guessed the wrong "claim" that the court decided to reject the dismissal of. Mattman00000 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]