Talk:Legio III Gallica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legio III Gallica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Dacia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stop using Livius.org as a credible source[edit]

Like really. Dude is messing stuff badly. He says that legions III and I were raised by Ceasar in 48 and used against Pompey in the Dyrrachium which is plain gibberish. We know which legions were transported with him from Italy to the Greece and I and III were not among them. The only recruit-legion that went with him was XVII, the rest were his veteran legions from Gallic wars. Why Livius is putting I and III into Dyrrachium? Because Pompey had HIS first and third in this battles. Totally diffrent units, that have NOTHING TO DO with Ceasar's consular series.

Livius org doesn't provide sources for his claims and when he do, it's always book of modern author (not actual ancient source that is needed) and always inaccessible in english. For this reason took me a while to understand how he got that I and III legion in Dyrrachium. He is not a source, nor he provides any for his claims, why is he cited here is beyond me