Talk:Le Clerc Milfort

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I’m confused as to why someone added the box that states there are no references sited in this article. I count 10 of them throughout this article. Please explain. Don

I added the sources/references tag when I was categorising the article. There a number of places where the tone is not quite encyclopedic and where the text seems to be speculating rather than stating facts that can be tracked back to a verifiable source. As well, the article could be improved by referring to a broader range of more formal references--for example, works of professional historians. Addere 23:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So is it the tone you are wanting fixed or the (several listed) missing references and/or links mentioned? I am not sure what you want now, as the box mentions "no references" and now your saying "the tone is not quite encyclopedic". Please be more clear as to what you would like fixed! Don

I have made many changes over the past few days to the article and have removed the box's. Let me know what you think. Dthem 2000 10:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Many external links are dead. It would be good to have academic works that refer to Milfort and his work with McGillivray, if these exist. Citations should include page numbers in books or articles.Parkwells (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight[edit]

It seems Undue weight to have such a lengthy quote from the 1851 history, about what is a small incident in Milfort's life. What is the point, exactly? It seems more appropriate as a link for the Conecuh County article, so I'm moving it there. We know that Milfort was in the territory, but this doesn't tell much about him. Parkwells (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Le Clerc Milfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Le Clerc Milfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]