Talk:Las Vegas Review-Journal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Review-journal-cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Review-journal-cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Righthaven is looking to back out of their lawsuit with the EFF.[edit]

[1] Looks like they want a dismissal with prejudice for their own claims and want the judge to toss out the EFF's counterclaims at the same time. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 12:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request[edit]

Hello - This page has outdated information.

1. Front page nameplate and layout has changed. Please see: https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/the-las-vegas-review-journal-is-changing-for-the-better/

2. Circulation numbers are now: Sunday = 162,507 (includes digital & RJ Select); Daily (M-F average) = 98,267 (includes digital) Source: AAM Q2 2017 Data Report:

3. The Las Vegas Review-Journal no longer owned by New Media Investment Group. It's now owned by Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc. Source: https://www.reviewjournal.com/ at bottom of page.

4. It may be beneficial to add what products are produced by the Review-Journal: "The multi-media news, information and entertainment company owns a strong portfolio of print and digital niche products, including the monthly Luxury Las Vegas magazine; the weekly Spanish language newspaper El Tiempo; and online business journal the Las Vegas Business Press. In addition to eleven zoned weekly View Neighborhood Newspaper editions throughout the Las Vegas Valley, the Review-Journal also owns weekly community newspapers and their websites including Boulder City Review, Pahrump Valley Times, Pahrump Mirror, and Tonopah Times-Bonanza & Goldfield News." Source: https://www.reviewjournal.com/ at bottom of page.

5. Under "Columnists," none of these columnists currently work here. Source: https://www.reviewjournal.com/rj-staff/

24.120.17.235 (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History tag[edit]

I removed the refimprove tag from the history section after adding a bunch of cites that pretty much cover it. The radio/TV call letters are not fully explained in the article as they are somewhat convoluted due to simulcasting under various call letters to satisfy FCC regs and some agreements. But, that level of detail isn’t needed and was mostly after they were sold. Perhaps it could be explained at KSNV. If there is still something that needs a cite, point it out and I’ll look for one. O3000 (talk) 12:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting COI editing[edit]

Because virtually all of the recent editing was from a COI source, I have reverted to the last clean version. I will manually restore whatever of the new material appears to be neutral and verified. --MelanieN (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joint operating agreement / Sun[edit]

An interesting article here regarding Adelson's ownership of the Review-Journal] as well as its joint operating agreement with the Sun. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership change in 2015[edit]

The ownership of this paper is massively important, with lots of contradictory info. Wikipedia coverage should help readers to sort out contradictory info. There are a number of articles from major news outlets, and presumably academic publications, about it. I think this aspect needs some improvement; I'm going to collect some source materials here on the talk page, and try to chip away at this a bit. Help welcome.

-Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Las_Vegas_Review-Journal&oldid=1205952649"