This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This message bitmap is still present in NTOSKRNL.EXE[edit]
Hello, as I noted in the title this bitmap is still present in Kernel Image Executable (NTOSKRNL.EXE and similar), so it is probably still used if there is failure in ACPI on newer Windows, also XP (and below) doesn't need ACPI compliant system, so it is possible to see this message on old systems as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.159.131.54 (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've used Windows 98 and made my own LOGO.SYS files, all uncompressed (no RLE). And they all work fine, despite being over 125KB and despite what this article says, so, I feel like either a correction or a citation is needed for the claim that a plain, non-RLE encoded BMP would have been "entirely too large" RetroFanboy990 (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
