Talk:LG15: The Last

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was do not merge into Lonelygirl15. -- Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should now be merged with Lonelygirl15 as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show.

I respectuflly disagree. This option was just discussed in the AfD that just ended, and the result was keep. But I am going to work on substantive improvements of lg15 related articles now instead of engaging in these debates more. Cheers. --Milowent (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails WP:N so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. KindredPhantom (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--Otterathome (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --Milowent (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe that this article should be merged. It is, in itself, independent from that of LonelyGirl15. It was created by fans, for fans. --Gwenavere14 (talk)
With only one person in support of merge, and this proposal hanging out there for more than 3 weeks now, it appears appropriate to close this discussion at this time. --Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]