Talk:L3Harris OA-1K Sky Warden

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L3Harris OA-1K Sky Warden article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Renaming Recommended[edit]

The Aircraft of the article has been designated the OA-1K Sky Warden since late last year (2022). I recommend the article be renamed in a similar way to the other aircraft in the USAF inventory by referring to the designation. Since I don't know how to do this yet, I'm being bold by quietly suggesting this course of action if I might be allowed to. -- Srwalden (talk) 02:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The designation is confirmed, but I've yet to see a source that states the name is in official use by SOCOM. Do you have one? BilCat (talk) 02:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Srwalden and BilCat:: As you say, the Sky Warden name doesn't appear to have been adopted by the AF or SOCOM as yet. The one official article I did find from August last year just refers to it as "the OA-1K Armed Overwatch aircraft". So perhaps just Air Tractor–L3Harris OA-1K for now, until a name is assigned? And also moving "Sky Warden" to the company designation in the lead? RadiculousJ (talk) 13:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"OA-1K Armed Overwatch aircraft" appears to be an amalgamation of the Tri-Service designation and the Armed Overwatch Plan which led to the acquisition of the aircraft. That said, apart from a photo from the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, I am not seeing very many reliable sources using "OA-1K Sky Warden". - ZLEA _T\^C 15:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found several reliable sources using "OA-1K Sky Warden", including AvWeek. Remember, it doesn't have to be an official name, just the most common one, and "Sky Warden" is used in several reliable sources. I'd support "Air Tractor-L3Harris OA-1K Sky Warden" or "L3Harris OA-1K Sky Warden" as the article's title as of now. (But don't get me started on the silliness of the "OA-1K" designation, when it should probably been "OA-14A"!) BilCat (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or OA-15A. "A-14" was briefly assigned to the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano before it was changed to "A-29B". - ZLEA _T\^C 17:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot about that one! Of course, designations have been reassigned before, so who knows. BilCat (talk) 21:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the "OA-1K Armed Overwatch aircraft" thing, Zlea did a better job of making the point I was trying to, that it doesn't appear to have an official nickname yet. However, as you say BilCat, it doesn't have to be official, just common in reliable sources, so "Sky Warden" should be included in the title for now, and it can of course be moved again if the AF/SOCOM pick a different name. I don't have a preference either way whether Air Tractor is included, though I believe I'm correct in saying that when two manufacturers are included it should be an en dash between them? And I'm glad to see I'm not the only person around who gets mildly annoyed over the increasing complete disregard for the AF's own rules for MDS designations. RadiculousJ (talk) 04:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No comment on en-dashes. I use hyphens for everything, in protest of Wikipedia's over-prescribing of en-dashes. After all, my computer keyboard doesn't have an en-dash key. The MOS wonks will be along in time to move the article. It keeps them occupied, and distracts them enough that hopefully they won't discover new "issues" to force on Wikipedia without proper consensus. :) BilCat (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support "L3 Harris OA-1K Sky Warden" all things considered. @BilCat nailed it. Srwalden (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]