Talk:Kurt & Courtney

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Alternative music: Nirvana

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Nirvana task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kurtandcourtneydvd.jpg[edit]

Image:Kurtandcourtneydvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible New Section[edit]

Should we include a section describing some of the errors included in the documentary that could not be cleared up before the release of the documentary. Ex- The test "proving" that someone could shoot themselvess while high on heroin was actually debunked prior to the release of the film but it was too late for Broomfield to correct it. The doctor involved verified that the experiment was flawed. So, should we include this info?BoyintheMachine (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusive evidence?[edit]

I didn't think the film made it look like Courtney Love could of had him killed. It's part of the film but even Nick stops believing it at one point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.251.19 (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. It's been a while since I watched it but if I remember correctly, Broomfield's conclusion was the exact opposite; that there wasn't enough evidence to suggest a conspiracy. 96.247.195.226 (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just watched this movie for the first time and there is no conclusion that Courtney had Kurt killed. Please fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.30.184 (talk) 04:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful here. The information about Ms Love surely falls under the rules of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reception?[edit]

You mention the "mixed reviews", yet include nothing on the film's reception. In that same vein, the persons impacted by and featured in the film surely had statements to make - condemnation, sorry they participated, comments out of context, or stand by their statements? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]