Talk:Kodak Starflash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In most circumstances, the primary sources template would be appropriate, however this article is relying strictly on the facts, and in one of the links, it links to an external source showing dated material. I do not believe the tag in this circumstance is appropriate, but am open to discussion to understand why citing original works on the product is inappropriate.

Robertlerner (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kodak Starflash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have two of the star flash cameras still in original box what are they worth Shannonmcconathy (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]