Talk:Kistler K-1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kistler K-1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Other Concepts[edit]

I removed a section by this name consisting of this text:

Kistler Aerospace also had another concept. A rocket-powered quadcopter, the second stage of the rocket would closely reassembled to Delta Clipper. Unlike the original concept, it would land by rocket engines rather than parachutes and airbags.

I'm not sure what this means, but it isn't sourced, Google doesn't seem to know about it, and the concept doesn't even seem likely. Maybe someone confused Kistler with the contemporary Rotary Rocket effort. 2601:647:4400:4727:C89A:9BC:8C41:32D5 (talk) 04:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found the information from the YouTuber Scott Manley. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 06:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How many times reusable[edit]

Planned for 100 reuses. - Did this include the engines too ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 January 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition, and name is used in the sources — Amakuru (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 (rocket) → Kistler K-1 – The current article title sounds weird, isn't it? Therefore, I suggest to rename it "Kistler K-1" à la SpaceX Starship. Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 05:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.