Talk:Kinki Sharyo P3010

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Transport

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is aging the only reason why this replaced the Nippon Sharyo vehicles?

The P3010s did a lot more than just replace the Nippon Sharyo trains. They were ordered to accommodate the significant expansion the system has been undergoing over the past decade or so. They also were meant to fill the needs that were originally supposed to be filled by the Breda P2550s -- those came in too heavy to operate along sone of the Blue Line infrastructure, so Metro chose to exercise their option for any trains beyond the initial delivery of 50. We've now reached the point where the majority of trains on the system are P3010s. The order was large enough that the P865/P2020s were able to be retired rather than having their lifetime extended further. --Jfruh (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, do you think aging is the only reason why the P865/P2020s retired? Clrichey (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kinkisharyo vs. Kinki Sharyo[edit]

The name of the company was recently changed to the two-word version throughout the article. For what it's worth, the US subsidiary who assembled the cars renders their name without the space:

http://www.kinkisharyo.com

But sometimes the article is referring to the Japanese parent and sometimes to the American company. Wanted to mention it here to get a consensus on how we should treat it. --Jfruh (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]