Talk:Kinghorn Methodist Episcopal Cemetery

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Ok. so whats wrong with this. Its an old area in the region. Ive seen articles started with much less information then this. Hubert Derus 20:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stated the reasoning in the prod notice. Essentially, just because something is old doesn't make it encyclopedic; it has nothing to do with the article's length. You've removed the prod, and I've left it at that. If you're upset that I prodded the article, so be it, but be aware that the fact that I think the article is unencyclopedic does not mean I think your contributions are worthless. Far from it... Mind matrix 13:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]