Talk:Kind of Blue/GA3

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The "Release history" has been tagged as needing more references since February 2010. I'm surprised no one has instigated a GAR yet. howcheng {chat} 17:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag If you place more specific {{cn}} tags on certain claims that you feel are unverified, it will be easy to resolve this. For now, this should help. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't apply the refimprove tag in the first place, but having an orange-level maintenance tag is incongruous with GA status. howcheng {chat} 21:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I sourced several statements when I could find the information in the sources, and I removed one sentence and a list that I could not source. (This removal should not affect the article's completeness in any way.) I removed the {{refimprove}} tag as a result. I think this should clear up all issues. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as references added.--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 16:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive a new commenter - The pitchfork rating for Kind of Blue as 6.6/10 is clearly directed as a review of the reissue not the actual album. This misleadingly presents the content of the review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.64.36 (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]