Talk:Kim Davis (singer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 9 March 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) feminist 14:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Kim Davis (Canadian singer)Kim Davis (singer) – This is the only singer named Kim Davis sufficiently notable to have an article on WP. Kim Davis (British singer) is a redirect to the article about the British Reggae band, Eruption (band), for which she was briefly lead singer in 1980, and she is barely mentioned in that article about that band's decade-long history. This Kim Davis on the other hand is notable for numerous awards and nominations, and a number of solo albums. The current title is misleading in that it wrongly implies there are other singers named Kim Davis sufficiently notable to have articles on WP. In the very unlikely event that someone is looking for the more obscure Kim Davis singer, a hatnote link to Eruption (band) will certainly suffice to manage that situation handily. В²C 23:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. -- Irn (talk) 03:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and suggest hatnote: "For other [singers|musicians] named Kim Davis, see Kim Davis#Musicians." We have references to at least three singers plus one rapper who some might consider a singer, but only one with an article. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm Re "sufficiently notable to have articles on WP" the idea that anything that wasn't forked out as a standalone article doesn't have any existence in the real world is only as real as There's Only One Kim Davis ... until someone goes to You-tube and inputs "Kim Davis" singer. And then the Ariola singles of the Kim Davis whose career was cut short by a brain haemorrhage come up before the Canadian. The current title is not misleading in the real world, only in the no-standalone-article no-exist make-believe world we are creating here. .... In ictu oculi (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • WP does not claim to be a reflection of the real world - only a reflection of the "notable" part of it, where "notable" is carefully defined by usage in WP:RS. Videos on Youtube are primary sources, not the secondary sources we rely on to establish what is considered WP:NOTABILITY here. --В²C 16:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Unreal7 (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Date of birth anyone?[edit]

Can we get any reliable biodata for this BLP? In ictu oculi (talk) 22:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Davis (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]