Talk:Killone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Problem with edit[edit]

Kellycrak88, please explain exactly what the problem is with my edit? Did I introduce incorrect content? Is guardianship of this national monument not vested in the OPW? If there are no problems with the edit, then it should be restored. (Your mentor should have pointed this out.) BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is meant to be a page about Killone civil parish, Killone Abbey has it own page where people can learn about OPW anyway @The Banner has since added it back Kellycrak88 (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Banner as you made the recent edit reverting changes, if you have to include OPW on this page (even though I think this shouldn't go here) I propose that you change the wording to the same as on Killone Abbey as the compromise, as the way it's currently worded is confusing about ownership and access Kellycrak88 (talk) 00:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering what's the status of the Pilgrim's Road... BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes the ancient Pilgrim's path which is the road people used for centuries it's not through Newhalll Estate, that's through Ballybeg forrest and connects Killone Abbey to Clare Abbey -- I believe there was submission to the council to install a public right of way there but there were several pages of objections and the council rejected the proposal (https://www.clarecoco.ie/services/planning/ccdp2017-2023/rptsubmissions/chief-executive-s-report-to-the-elected-members-on-submissions-received-on-public-rights-of-way-part-iii-of-iii-23019.pdf) Kellycrak88 (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes, that's the source you keep misquoting. That's the one with identical submissions from a few people that asserts there actually is an ancient right-of-way - the Pilgrim's Road - and another via Ballylea and the CEO of the Council "recommends" (his words) that the council "not preserve" a right-of-way. You've not provided any evidence that the Council accepted the CEO's recommendation or voted to extinguish an existing right of way. All this is is a report to the council with recommendations. Not a record of council decisions. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
plenty of evidence has been provided, on the contrary, if you're maintaining this stance... you have yet to provide any proof that a public right of way ever existed - many people have been confused claiming there was a public right of way as we can see in the councillor submission (from the source provided by The Banner) which the admin officer replying corrected and clarified, hence a wikipedia article also stating there is a public right of way helped that incorrect view Kellycrak88 (talk) 11:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, another source you have read badly and only in a way that serves your opinion. The Banner talk 12:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]