Talk:Khiamniungan people

India: Nagaland Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nagaland (assessed as Low-importance).

Ethnic groups Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Regarding proposal to merge Khiamniungan People and Khiamniungan Naga[edit]

With due respect to all wikipedians, I personally feel the need to keep both the articles without merging if possible. But, if wikipedians and other involves are agree to do so, I am okay with it. I initially wrote the article 'Khiamniungan Naga' because we who belong to this particular community tends to search on the internet Khiamniungan Naga rather than the other: which i believe as stronger term and necessary. Therefore, if there is any possibility to keep both the articles separately, please do so. Otherwise, I have no other concrete reasons to provide proof to keep the Contents intact. Thanks.

Yours Sincerely Khunou S

Khunou S (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are meant to handle alternative search terms, not content forking. utcursch | talk 20:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]