Talk:Khemkaran

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Links[edit]

{{wikify}}[edit]

Very few wikilinks. Not sure if to wikilink the tank names. -x42bn6 02:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Khemkarancaptured.jpg[edit]

Image:Khemkarancaptured.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuetral Point Of View[edit]

Please help in making this article nuetral....There have been unexplained reverts to fact that khemkaran fell to Pakistan in 1965 and After Tashkent agreement, Pakistan gave the land back to India but left behind destroyed tanks which India claimed to have captured....Its Obvious that if India had captured 97 Pakitan tanks and destroyed many more then they couldn't have lost Khemkaran to Pakistan...But they DID...??? Please explain with a valid reference....???..Adil your (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well there are quite a few sources which say that the city remained with Pakistan till Tashkent declaration. like this one http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Battle_of_Asal_Uttar

This reference is completely fake, give us proper site reference. I don't agree with all these fact, seriously if India Captured 97 Pakistani then how could we loose land. Logic is not fit. Please rectify this one. User:PRATAP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.251.93.49 (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

stating "Pakistan's First Armoured Division could not take Asal Uttar but held on to the captured Khem Karen until the Tashkant Agreement between the two governments. "

I my self am an Indian, and being an Indian means to me that it is my duty to find and spread what the truth is regards

Krishna --Krishna's Chakra (talk) 08:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the link http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Battle_of_Asal_Uttar mentioned above, seems to me nothing more than an old archived copy of the wikipedia article on Battle of Asal Uttar dBigXray (talk) 10:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]