Talk:Keysight

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Why is this redirected to Agilent? They are separate companies now, and Keysight is big enough to be notable. How does one remove a link?

You are correct, so I put a short draft here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Keysight_Technologies . Someone should review it (and add as needed) and replace the redirect text at with the article using https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keysight_Technologies&action=edit . This page should then redirect to the article. hth. SageGreenRider (talk) 13:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed a while back SageGreenRider (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keysight Technologies recently rebranded as just Keysight. May need to update the logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:43CC:A400:5C05:78AC:C62E:B056 (talk) 04:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information on ITAR Compliance issue[edit]

The section titled "Accusations of support for Russian censorship" - has further factual information on the issue available from the U.S. Department of State.

https://www.state.gov/u-s-department-of-state-concludes-6-6-million-settlement-of-alleged-export-violations-by-keysight-technologies-inc/

I believe this should be added to this section to show what was actually charged in the 2021 ITAR violations VS the claims made by The Washington Post.

--Retoxx (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]