Talk:Kevin Grady/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grondemar 18:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Working I will aim to post a complete review within the next couple of days. Grondemar 18:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One early comment based on my first read-through: what ended up happening to him for the upcoming season? Did he eventually make it to an NFL training camp; did he sign with a UFL team; is he out of football entirely? I did a Google search but wasn't able to find anything. Grondemar 18:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think his career is over. At least I have been unable to document any signing. I think he retains permanent notability despite never playing professionally.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I completed my review and have the following concerns, in addition to the one above:

  • Under High school career, why is All-State in italics?
  • It would be nice to add a little more about his recruiting. Did he consider any other schools before selecting Michigan?
  • I added a sentence to the Junior year (2007) section: "He would miss the entire 2007 season recovering from his injuries; by making use of a redshirt year, however, he was able to not use up a year of eligibility.[citation needed]" I'm pretty sure this is accurate and fills a gap in the narrative; could you find a source for this however?
    • The next section starts with a ref for the fact that he was still recovering during the following Spring. I just moved that one to your cn tag.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you have statistics for Kevin Grady's senior season?
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    The article will be on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thank you. Grondemar 16:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With all above concerns addressed, I am passing this Good Article Nomination. Congratulations! Grondemar 03:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]