Talk:Kering
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Kering Foundation page were merged into Kering on 29 December 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Tax Evasion[edit]
I've added the tax evasion controversy again. Actually, it's not much of a controversy. In France (Kering is a French Group) everybody knows. Compare French Kering Article for more info. And stop ruining Wikipedia by censuring it to serve big corporate interests. Thanks!
-- Naimadia 22:35, 08 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimadia (talk • contribs)
- Hi user who's only interested in leading a French intifada on one page. I removed your contribution because, as it states, it is only a "possible" accusation. And by judging how you insist on pushing this possible accusation, the intent of vandalism appears obvious. Please come back when the justice will validate or invalidate this accusation, because with or without sources, Wikipedia can't gather all accusations thrown by anyone out there. Editive (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
If you think that "with our without sources" is the same thing, then this is really not the right place for you, my friend.
-- Naimadia 23:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimadia (talk • contribs)
Direction board[edit]
I've added the direction board, regarding the french PPR wiki page. Please change if you think it's not correct, or if there has been some changes since february.
I've deleted Prada from the list of PPR's competitors, as the Prada group is no longer a true conglomerate (it's has currently sold or is selling it's last high profile labels). If you're interested, you can read more about this on the section of the Prada article about the company "As luxury conglomerate."
-- Vincentanton 01:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
""From luxury to sustainability""[edit]
From luxury to sustainability section reads like an advertorial ,very little in the way of objectivity ,looks pasta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0D:200:DB00:2DD6:A749:1A00:547A (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Cult[edit]
Internet leaning towards company owners being involved in Satanic Cult and witch craft for the masses behind there apparel. 2600:8807:A792:C200:C581:147A:F419:D6E2 (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Merger with Kering Foundation[edit]
Most companies don't have their foundations made into a separate article. I do think that it is best that Kering Foundation be merged into here; since it's also a more promotional article, much of it could be gutted. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 20:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
